Automated Summary
Key Facts
The attorney appointed to represent Traylan Xavier Mosley has moved for leave to withdraw and submitted an Anders brief. The court reviewed the brief and the relevant portions of the record, concurring with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. As a result, the motion to withdraw was granted, and the appeal was dismissed.
Holdings
The attorney appointed to represent Traylan Xavier Mosley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mosley has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Remedies
The appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Legal Principles
The court applied the Rule of Law as established in Anders v. California and United States v. Flores, determining that the appeal presented no nonfrivolous issues, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Precedent Name
- United States v. Flores
- Anders v. California
Judge Name
- Higginsbotham
- Ramirez
- Engelhardt
Passage Text
- We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
- The attorney appointed to represent Traylan Xavier Mosley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).