Geminia Insurance Co Limited v Co-op Bank Fleet Africa Leasing (Civil Suit E007 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 1289 (KLR) (22 January 2024) (Ruling)

Kenya Law

Automated Summary

Key Facts

Geminia Insurance Co Limited insured a motor vehicle (GKB 540Y) leased to the National Police Service under Policy No. MCV/NBI/2021/001934 (Certificate B 12415013) from 2022-11-04 to 2023-11-03. The policy excluded liability for injuries to police employees during employment. On 2023-04-01, the vehicle was involved in an accident injuring PC Laban Kibet, a police officer. A related case (Ogembo PMCC No. E137 of 2023) was filed by Laban Kibet against Co-op Bank Fleet Africa Leasing. Geminia applied to stay these proceedings, arguing non-liability under the insurance contract. The court dismissed the stay application but ordered the case to be heard on a priority basis, emphasizing that the stay would prejudicially affect the third party's right to litigate.

Transaction Type

Insurance Policy covering motor vehicle with exclusion for police employee injuries

Issues

The court considered whether to grant a stay of proceedings in Ogembo PMCC No. E137 of 2023 (Laban Kibet vs. Co-op Bank Fleet Africa Leasing) pending determination of the instant civil suit (Geminia Insurance Co Limited v Co-op Bank Fleet Africa Leasing). The applicant argued that the insurance contract excluded liability for injuries to National Police Service employees during employment, and that the lower court proceedings risked prejudicing the insurer's ability to repudiate the policy under Section 10(4) of the Insurance (Motor Vehicles Third Party Risks) Act. The court emphasized the need to balance the insurer's interests with third parties' constitutional rights to access justice and expeditious disposal of cases.

Holdings

  • The court dismissed the application for stay of proceedings, finding it unmerited. It held that the issue of repudiating the insurance contract is solely between the plaintiff and defendant, and that staying a third party's suit would be prejudicial. The court emphasized that the right to litigate without unnecessary interruption must be protected, as no judgment had been rendered in the primary suit.
  • The court directed that the main suit (Geminia Insurance Co Limited v Co-op Bank Fleet Africa Leasing) be heard on a priority basis. It ruled that costs would abide the outcome of the suit, and set a mention date for pre-trial directions on 8.5.24.

Remedies

  • The court directs that the suit shall be heard on a priority basis to expedite resolution.
  • The application for stay of proceedings is dismissed. The court finds the Appellant's Application unmerited and declines to impose a stay.
  • Costs in the case shall abide the outcome of the proceedings.

Legal Principles

  • The court relied on Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, which grants inherent powers to act in the interest of justice. This principle was used to justify dismissing the stay application, as no judgment had been rendered in the primary suit, and staying proceedings could prejudice third parties.
  • The court cited precedents where stay of proceedings was denied when it would impede third parties' rights to litigate (e.g., Saham Assurance Co. Ltd. v Lameck Okari Mairura [2021] eKLR). This reinforced the dismissal of the application in the instant case.
  • The court referenced Section 10(4) of the Insurance (Motor Vehicles Third Party Risks) Act, which allows insurers to avoid liability if claims arise from non-disclosure or false representations. This was a key argument in the plaintiff's case but did not justify a stay due to the absence of a final judgment.
  • The court held that the insurance contract issue (repudiation) is strictly between the plaintiff and defendant. Third-party suits, like Laban Kibet's, cannot be stayed based on a contractual dispute between the insurer and insured, as privity does not extend to third parties.
  • The court emphasized the importance of balancing the rights of parties under the Constitution, particularly Article 50, which guarantees access to justice and the expeditious disposal of cases. The application for stay of proceedings was dismissed to avoid prejudicing third parties' rights to litigate.

Precedent Name

  • Monarch Insurance Company Limited vs. Wycliffe Onyango Odenda
  • Corporate Insurance Company Limited v Charles John Musee
  • Rev. Madara Evans Okanga v Housing Finance Company of Kenya
  • Madison Insurance Company Limited v Michael Muathe
  • Britam General Insurance Company (Kenya) Limited vs. Stephen Wambua Masila & 11 Others
  • Saham Assurance Company Limited v Lameck Okari Mairura
  • Britam Insurance Co. Ltd. v Jane Muthoni Mwangi; Kevin Ouma Ochieng & 3 Others
  • Trident Insurance Company Limited vs. Amos Njenga Gitau T/A Young Achievers School
  • George Oraro vs. Kenya Television Network

Key Disputed Contract Clauses

The insurance contract specifically excluded coverage for death or bodily injury to employees of the National Police Service arising in the course of their employment. This clause formed the basis of Geminia Insurance Co Limited's argument that it was not liable for PC Laban Kibet's injuries in the accident.

Cited Statute

  • Insurance (Motor Vehicles Third Party Risks) Act
  • Work Injury Benefits Act
  • Civil Procedure Act

Judge Name

Teresa Odera

Passage Text

  • "The stay of proceedings is a serious, grave and fundamental interruption in the right that a party has to conduct his litigation towards the trial on the basis of the substantive merits of his case, and therefore the court's general practice is that a stay of proceedings should not be imposed unless the proceeding beyond all reasonable doubt ought not to be allowed to continue."
  • "First, the Applicant is not a party in Milimani H.C.C.C. No. 112 of 2013. It is clear that the aforesaid suit is between the injured and the Applicant's insured. Even if judgment was given in favour of the injured party, the decree will not be executed against the insurer but against the insured."
  • "I therefore find the Appellant's Application is unmerited and I hereby proceed to dismiss it. I however direct that the suit shall be heard on priority basis. Costs shall abide the outcome of the suit."

Damages / Relief Type

Declaratory relief sought to determine insurer's liability under the insurance contract.