Moancha v Vision Point Sacco Ltd (Cause 56 of 2019) [2022] KEELRC 1526 (KLR) (2 June 2022) (Ruling)

Kenya Law

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The claimant (Salima Bitutu Moancha) applied to review the dismissal of her suit against Vision Point Sacco Ltd, arguing she was not served with the Notice to Show Cause due to a wrong postal address (P.O. Box 8054 instead of 854 Kisii) and was unable to attend court on the mention date because she had recently delivered a baby. She also cited the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on her ability to prosecute the case. The court confirmed the Notice to Show Cause was improperly served via the incorrect address and found no prejudice to the respondent if the suit was reinstated. The judge ruled that the claimant demonstrated sufficient cause to warrant reviewing the dismissal order, allowing the application but awarding Kshs. 5000 in costs to the respondent.

Issues

  • Whether Applicant has shown sufficient cause to warrant review of the impugned order.
  • Whether allowing the application will prejudice the respondent.

Holdings

  • The court found that the Claimant established sufficient ground to warrant the review and setting aside of the order dismissing the suit on 11th November 2021. This was based on the Claimant's contention that the Notice to Show Cause was served at an incorrect postal address (P.O Box 8054 instead of 854 Kisii) and her inability to attend court due to childbirth. The court confirmed the service error in the court record and ruled this constituted excusable mistake under the law.
  • The court determined that the Respondent failed to demonstrate any prejudice that could not be compensated by costs if the application was allowed. It concluded that dismissing the application would have caused greater prejudice to the Claimant by barring her from justice without fault. The application was therefore allowed, with costs assessed at Kshs. 5000 to the Respondent.

Remedies

  • The court allowed the application to review and set aside the dismissal order, reinstating the suit for hearing on merits as requested by the Claimant.
  • The court assessed the costs of the application at Kshs 5000, to be paid by the respondent.

Legal Principles

The court applied judicial review principles to determine that the dismissal order could be set aside due to excusable mistakes in service (wrong postal address) and lack of prejudice to the respondent. The ruling emphasized that the discretion to set aside decisions should avoid injustice from accident, inadvertence, or excusable error, as per Shab v Mbogo [1967] EA 116.

Precedent Name

Shab v Mbogo and Another

Cited Statute

  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Procedure Rules

Judge Name

Onesmus N. Maka

Passage Text

  • Therefore, I find and hold that the applicant has established sufficient ground to warrant the review and setting aside of the order dismissing the suit on 11th November, 2021.
  • Consequently, I allow the application as prayed but with costs to the respondent which I have assessed at Kshs. 5000.