Ibrahim v Ahmed & another (Civil Appeal E054 of 2021) [2024] KEHC 10840 (KLR) (18 September 2024) (Judgment)

Kenya Law

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The case arises from a road traffic accident on the Nanyuki-Nyeri highway. The Appellant, a passenger in motor vehicle KCP 320T, collided with KCD 471Q driven by the 1st Respondent and owned by the 2nd Respondent. The Appellant claimed injuries and sought damages, but the trial court dismissed the claim for general damages due to insufficient medical evidence.

Issues

  • What reliefs the court may grant in the appeal, including setting aside the trial court's dismissal of the general damages claim and remitting the case for reassessment with directions.
  • Whether the trial court can assess general damages without a medical report, relying on other medical evidence such as treatment notes and P3 forms.

Holdings

  • The Appellant is awarded half the costs of this Appeal.
  • The Court remits the original file in Nyeri CMCC No.125 of 2019 Hafsa Abdullahi Vs- Abdirizak Ali Ahmed & Another back to the trial Court, with directions that the trial Court assesses the general damages from the evidence of the Plaintiff on record and any other medical evidence produced including Medical Case Summary.
  • The Judgement of the trial Court dismissing the claim for general damages is hereby set aside.
  • In the event the Honourable Magistrate who initially heard the suit is no longer in the Station, the file may be placed before any other Magistrate for consideration and compliance with the orders of this Court.

Remedies

  • The case is remitted to the trial court with directions to assess general damages using the plaintiff's evidence and other medical documents.
  • The court sets aside the trial court's dismissal of the claim for general damages.
  • If the original magistrate is no longer available, the case may be transferred to another magistrate for compliance with the court's orders.
  • The appellant is awarded half the costs of the appeal.

Legal Principles

The court determined that the trial court erred in dismissing the claim for general damages due to absence of a medical report. It clarified that injuries need not be proved solely by medical reports; evidence such as P3 forms and medical summaries suffice under the standard of proof (balance of probabilities). This aligns with precedents like Carolyne Indasi Mwonyonyo vs Kenya Bus Service Ltd (2012) eKLR and Esther Chepkemoi Ngecher vs John Kungu & Charles Muthoka (2022) eKLR.

Precedent Name

  • Esther Chepkemoi Ngecher vs John Kungu and Charles Muthoka
  • Carolyne Indasi Mwonyonyo vs Kenya Bus Service Ltd
  • Selle and Another –vs- Associated Motor Boat Company Ltd and others
  • Gladys Wanjiru Njaramba –vs- Globe Pharmacy & another
  • Mordekai Mwangi Nandwa –vs- Bhoglas Garage Ltd

Judge Name

Benjamin K. Njoroge

Passage Text

  • The Judgement of the trial Court dismissing the claim for general damages is hereby set aside.
  • The Court disagrees. The courts have held that injuries need not be proved by medical reports, which are expert opinions. Medical treatment notes, P3 forms and discharge summaries will do.