Automated Summary
Key Facts
The claim was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules due to the claimant's failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 25/2/2021, failure to make sufficient written representations, and the claim not being actively pursued. The Tribunal determined these actions rendered the claim scandalous, unreasonable, or vexatious.
Issues
- The claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's Order dated 25/2/2021.
- The claimant's conduct was considered scandalous, unreasonable, or vexatious.
- The claim was not actively pursued by the claimant.
Holdings
- The claim has not been actively pursued.
- The claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 25/2/2021.
- The manner in which the proceedings have been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant has been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious.
Remedies
The claim is struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 25/2/2021 and failed to make any sufficient representations or request a hearing as required.
Legal Principles
The Employment Tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37, which permits dismissal when proceedings are conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable, or vexatious manner, the claimant fails to comply with Tribunal orders, or the claim is not actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's request to justify why the claim should not be struck out.
Cited Statute
N/A
Judge Name
Employment Judge Wright
Passage Text
- • the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant has been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious; • the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 25/2/2021. • it has not been actively pursued.
- The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing.