Nkunde v Cetzam Financial Services Ltd (HK 198 of 2010) [2013] ZMHC 25 (26 September 2013)

ZambiaLII

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The plaintiff, Suzen Mwela Nkunde, applied for a K5,000,000 loan from Cetzam Financial Services in 2009, providing a K1,000,000 security deposit and her title deed. The loan was never processed, and the defendant fraudulently allowed Barnabas Ng'andwe to obtain a K10,000,000 loan using her title deed without her knowledge or consent. This led to an advertisement for the sale of her house in the Post Newspaper on 13th February, 2010, falsely implying she defaulted on a loan. The defendant failed to return the remaining K600,000 security deposit and the title deed, which was later returned in March 2013. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff for the unpaid security balance and awarded K15,000,000 in damages for fraudulent use of the title deed.

Transaction Type

Loan agreement for K5,000,000 secured by title deed and deposit

Issues

  • The court addressed the defendant's unauthorized use of the plaintiff's title deed to process a K10,000,000 loan for Barnabas Ng'andwe without her knowledge or consent. The court found this conduct fraudulent, awarding the plaintiff K15,000,000 in damages to compensate for the distress and inconvenience caused by the misuse of her property.
  • The plaintiff claimed the defendant's advertisement in the Post Newspaper (13th February 2010) implied she was financially insolvent through innuendo. The court found the plaintiff failed to provide the actual words of the advertisement or an authenticated copy, and she did not sufficiently establish that the publication could be understood as defamatory by those aware of the extrinsic facts. The defamation claim was dismissed.
  • The court determined whether the defendant must return the K600,000 balance of a security payment made by the plaintiff for an unprocessed loan. The plaintiff paid K1,000,000 as security for a K5,000,000 loan, but the defendant failed to disburse the loan. Only K400,000 was refunded, leaving K600,000 unpaid. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, awarding the remaining amount with interest.

Holdings

  • The court found the defendant's use of the plaintiff's title deed fraudulent and awarded K15,000,000 in general damages for the plaintiff's distress. The award includes interest at the average bank deposit rate from the writ date to the judgment date and at the current bank lending rate thereafter.
  • The court awarded the plaintiff K600,000 (now K600.00) for the failed loan consideration, with interest at the average bank deposit rate from the date of the writ to the judgment date and at the current bank lending rate thereafter.
  • The defamation claim was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to provide the actual words of the advertisement, an authenticated copy, and sufficient extrinsic facts to establish libel by innuendo. The court found the plaintiff could not prove the advertisement defamed her.

Remedies

  • Judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of K600,000 (now K600.00) with interest at the average of the bank deposit rate per annum from date of writ to date of judgment and thereafter at the current bank lending rate as determined by the Bank of Zambia until fully paid.
  • Damages awarded to the plaintiff in the sum of K15,000,000 (now K15,000.00) with interest at the average of the bank deposit rate per annum from date of writ to date of judgment and thereafter at the current bank lending rate as determined by the Bank of Zambia from time to time until fully paid.
  • Costs awarded to the plaintiff to be taxed if not agreed.

Contract Value

5000000.00

Monetary Damages

15000.00

Legal Principles

  • The court held that the plaintiff did not meet the burden of proof to demonstrate that the newspaper advertisement carried a defamatory innuendo. The plaintiff's failure to produce the original newspaper and supplement claims with extrinsic facts led to the defamation claim being dismissed.
  • The defendant was found liable for fraudulent use of the plaintiff's title deed, allowing Barnabas Ng'andwe to obtain a loan on her property without her knowledge or consent. The court awarded general damages for this breach.

Precedent Name

Collins v Jones

Judge Name

R.M.C. Kaoma

Passage Text

  • I am satisfied that the consideration for which the security was paid has wholly failed. Therefore, I find and hold that the defendant has no justification to hold onto the plaintiff's money. Accordingly I enter judgment for the plaintiff for the balance of K600,000 (now K600.00) with interest...
  • The fraudulent acts of the defendant in this case would have entitled the plaintiff to an award of aggravated damages... I award the plaintiff damages in the sum of K15,000,000 (now K15,000.00) with interest...
  • The plaintiff's plea... I cannot construe the particular words used... Therefore, I hold that the plaintiff has failed to establish that the said publication referred to her... I decline to hold that the publication amounted to libel based on innuendo. Accordingly the claim for defamation fails.

Damages / Relief Type

  • Compensatory Damages of K15,000,000 for fraudulent use of title deed.
  • Restitution of K600,000 for failed loan consideration.
  • Costs awarded to the plaintiff, to be taxed if not agreed.