Taita Taveta University College v Rugut & Maritim (Suing on their own behalf and as the administrators of the estate of the late Cosmas Kipserem Kipkoech) (Civil Appeal E009 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 12772 (KLR) (31 August 2022) (Judgment)

Kenya Law

Automated Summary

Key Facts

Taita Taveta University College appeals against a damages award in a fatal road accident case involving 23-year-old student Cosmas Kipserem Kipkoech. The deceased, a first-year agriculture student, died instantly in an accident with the appellant's vehicle. The trial court awarded Kshs 3,161,275 in general and special damages (10% contribution deducted) based on a 30-year multiplier and Kshs 25,000 monthly income. The appellate court reduced the multiplier to 25 years and multiplicand to Kshs 20,000, resulting in a revised award of Kshs 1,914,750. The case focuses on the quantum of damages for loss of dependency and future earnings, with the court acknowledging the speculative nature of such calculations.

Deceased Name

Cosmas Kipserem Kipkoech

Issues

  • The court examined if the trial magistrate erred by applying principles that failed to account for uncertainties in the deceased's future earnings, such as his health, business prospects, and the potential for changes in income. The appeal argued the lower court did not properly apply Lord Wright's rule on damages.
  • The court evaluated if the 30-year multiplier was unrealistic, given the deceased's age and uncertainties like his health, potential for illness, and the economic environment. The appeal argued these factors were not adequately considered, leading to an inflated award.
  • The court assessed whether the Kshs. 3,000,000 awarded for loss of dependency was manifestly excessive, considering the deceased's age (23 years), speculative future earnings, and the economic environment. The appeal challenged the realism of the multiplier (30 years) and the multiplicand (Kshs. 25,000/month) used in the calculation.
  • The appellant challenged the use of a Kshs. 25,000/month income figure, which was not specifically pleaded in the case. The court noted this as a basis for the appeal, as the amount was higher than the Kshs. 20,000/month proposed by the appellant.
  • The appeal questioned if the trial court properly applied the Law Reform Act and Fatal Accidents Act, particularly in assessing the deceased's dependents (two adult brothers) and the speculative nature of his future earnings as a student.

Holdings

  • The court ordered the award to attract interest from the date of the lower court's judgment and directed each party to bear its own costs of the appeal.
  • The court allowed the appeal, reducing the damages from Kshs. 3,161,275 to Kshs. 2,127,500 (less 10% contribution, net balance Kshs. 1,914,750). The trial magistrate's use of a 30-year multiplier and Kshs. 25,000 monthly income was deemed speculative and unrealistic, replaced with a 25-year multiplier and Kshs. 20,000 multiplicand.

Remedies

  • Each party shall bear its own costs of the appeal. The court did not make an order for costs of the lower court as it was not raised in the appeal.
  • The court awarded a total of Kshs. 2,127,500 (Kshs. 20,000 for pain & suffering, Kshs. 2,000,000 for loss of dependency, Kshs. 100,000 for loss of life expectation, and Kshs. 7,500 for special damages), reduced by 10% contribution to a balance of Kshs. 1,914,750.
  • The awarded sum of Kshs. 1,914,750 shall attract interest from the date of the lower court's judgment until payment in full.

Monetary Damages

2127500.00

Probate Status

Letters of Administration granted for the estate of the late Cosmas Kipserem Kipkoech

Legal Principles

Lord Wright's rule establishes a method for calculating damages by ascertaining the net income of the deceased available for dependents, deducting personal expenses, and capitalizing the remaining amount using a multiplier that accounts for life expectancy, earning capacity uncertainties, and other contingencies. The court emphasized this principle in assessing future earnings and highlighted the speculative nature of such calculations.

Precedent Name

  • Ctholic Diocese of Kisumu v Spphia Achieng Tete
  • Davies v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Limited
  • Mensah v Amakom Sawmill
  • Kemfro Africa Ltd & another v Lubia & another

Executor Name

  • LENAH JEBUNGEI RUGUT
  • JOSEPH KIPROP MARITIM

Cited Statute

  • Fatal Accidents Act
  • Law Reform Act

Executor Appointment

Administrators of the estate of the late Cosmas Kipserem Kipkoech

Judge Name

  • Stephen Githinji
  • John M. Mativo

Passage Text

  • Method of calculating damages: When the income of the deceased is derived from his own earnings, 'it then becomes necessary to consider what, but for the accident which terminated his life, work and remuneration, and also how far these, if realized, would have conducted to the benefit of the individual claiming compensation.'
  • The trial Magistrate did not accentuate the applicable principles in cases of this nature. Two of the persons named as dependents are brothers. It's too speculative to say the deceased would have completed college and support his siblings who are adults.
  • Accordingly, I will allow the appeal and enter judgment as follows:- ... The said sum shall attract interests from the date of the judgment of the lower court.

Beneficiary Classes

Dependent Relative