Export Consolidated Services Kenya Limited v Gitau (Appeal E162 of 2025) [2025] KEELRC 3689 (KLR) (18 December 2025) (Judgment)

Kenya Law

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The case involves Isaac Mukuru Gitau, who was employed by Export Consolidated Services Kenya Limited from October 2010 as a turn man and later promoted to truck driver. His employment was terminated in December 2021 due to redundancy. Gitau claimed underpayments, unpaid leave, overtime, and other benefits for over 11 years of service. The trial court ruled the termination unfair and awarded compensation, but the appeal court found the termination lawful, citing adherence to redundancy procedures under the Employment Act. The appeal court adjusted awards for underpayments and house allowance to Ksh. 13,741.80 and severance pay to Ksh. 60,585.45 for 6 years of service post-conversion to a written contract.

Issues

  • The court evaluated the calculation of severance pay based on 6 years of employment, determining if the award aligned with section 40's requirement of 15 days' pay per completed year.
  • The court assessed whether the employer adhered to statutory redundancy procedures, including notice requirements and consultation with employees, as mandated by section 40 of the Employment Act.
  • The court reviewed if the employer's inclusion of a 15% house allowance in the respondent's wage package satisfied statutory requirements under section 31 of the Employment Act.
  • The court considered the respondent's overtime claim over 11 years, weighing it against evidence of extended sick leave and annual leave usage to determine if it constituted unjust enrichment.
  • The court examined if the respondent's claims for underpayments spanning over 11 years were time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, which limits claims for continuing injuries to 12 months.
  • The court reassessed the 8-month compensation award for unfair termination, determining if it exceeded permissible limits under principles established in precedent cases like Freight In Time Limited v Rosebell Wambui Munene.

Holdings

  • Severance pay was calculated for 6 full years of service (from 4 January 2016 to 15 January 2022) at the rate of 15 days per year. The total severance pay awarded was Ksh. 60,585.45 based on the respondent's final gross wage of Ksh. 20,195.15.
  • The court determined that the respondent's employment was lawfully terminated as the appellant complied with redundancy procedures under section 40 of the Employment Act. The termination notice was issued on 16 December 2021 with a one-month notice period, and the redundancy was justified due to economic challenges from SGR cargo services and the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • The court found that underpayments (including house allowance) for the period up to 12 months prior to termination totaled Ksh. 13,741.80. This amount reflects the difference between the respondent's wage and the minimum statutory requirements for a truck driver in Mombasa as of January 2022.
  • The court ruled that costs of the appeal and trial court should be borne by each party individually. This decision was based on the principle that costs in employment claims must be justified under section 12(4) of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act and Rule 73 of the court's procedural rules.

Remedies

  • Each party to bear its costs for the appeal and trial court.
  • Underpayments, including house allowance, Ksh. 13,741.80.
  • Employment of the respondent was lawfully terminated.
  • Severance pay for 6 years Ksh. 60,585.45.

Monetary Damages

74327.25

Legal Principles

  • The court applied the limitation period under section 90 of the Employment Act, requiring claims for continuing injuries (e.g., underpayments) to be filed within 12 months of their cessation. This was based on precedent in Vipingo Ridge Limited v Swalehe Ngonge Mpitta, which clarified that monthly-accruing employment benefits must be addressed within the 12-month window post-cessation.
  • The court applied the principle of Natural Justice in assessing whether the employer followed proper redundancy procedures under section 40 of the Employment Act, including issuing general and personal notices, conducting consultations, and applying selection criteria (seniority, skill, reliability). The court emphasized that due process requires consultation and clear communication of redundancy reasons, as established in cases like The German School Society v Ohany.

Precedent Name

  • Kenya Airways Ltd v Aviation & Allied Workers Union Kenya & 3 others
  • Freight In Time Limited v Rosebell Wambui Munene
  • Cargill Kenya Limited v Mwaka & 3 others
  • Omondi v Medisel (Kenya) Limited & another
  • The German School Society & another v Ohany & another
  • Kenya Railways Corporation v Ododa & 216 others

Cited Statute

  • Employment Act
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Act

Judge Name

M. Mbaru

Passage Text

  • 46. From 4 January 2016 to 15 January 2022, the respondent served for 6 full years. The last due wage is at Ksh. 20,195.15 gives the severance pay of 15 days for 6 years at Ksh. 60,585.45.
  • a. Employment of the respondent was lawfully terminated.
  • 39. The underpayments sought by the respondent are for wages paid from 3 October 2010 to 1 June 2018 as a turn man. He further claims underpayments from 1 July 2018 to 12 December 2021 when employed as a truck driver.