First Tower Loan Llc Dba Tower Loan Of Winnfield V Matthew Powell

Court Listener

Automated Summary

Key Facts

Matthew Powell took out a $4,909.45 loan from Tower Loan on September 30, 2022, with a 31.73% APR requiring 30 payments of $241.00 each. His final payment was due April 9, 2025, but his last payment occurred on July 24, 2023, leaving a balance of $4,482.78. Tower Loan filed suit on January 29, 2024, seeking this balance plus 30.48% interest for the first year (from December 13, 2023) and 18% thereafter. The district court initially awarded 'legal interest' instead of the contractual rate, prompting an appeal. The appellate court found the district court lacked authority to disregard the verified 30.48%/18% interest rate and amended the judgment accordingly.

Transaction Type

Loan agreement involving default judgment and interest rate dispute

Issues

  • Whether the court erred in not awarding interest as requested in the petition under La. C.C. art. 1921.
  • Whether the court erred in not signing the proposed default judgment or directing a hearing under La. C.C.P. art. 1702(C).
  • Whether the court erred in failing to accept Tower Loan's affidavit of correctness as prima facie proof of the indebtedness under La. C.C.P. art. 1702(B)(3).
  • Whether the court erred in reducing the interest rate to legal interest from the contractual rate specified in the loan agreement, violating La. R.S. 9:3519 and 9:3522.

Holdings

  • The district court erred in failing to accept Tower Loan's affidavit of correctness as prima facie proof of the indebtedness under La. C.C.P. art. 1702(B)(3) and in not signing the proposed default judgment as required by La. C.C.P. art. 1702(C). These procedural errors require the judgment to be amended.
  • The court improperly reduced the contractual interest rate to 'legal interest' in the judgment, contrary to the loan agreement's terms (30.48% for one year beginning December 13, 2023, and 18% thereafter) and La. R.S. 9:3519/9:3522. The judgment is amended to reflect the contractual rates.

Remedies

  • The court affirmed the security interest in the movables described in the loan agreement as part of the remedies granted to the plaintiff.
  • The court ordered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, First Tower Loan, LLC, for $4,482.78, together with interest at 30.48% per annum for one year beginning December 13, 2023, and 18% thereafter until paid. The judgment also requires the defendant to pay all costs associated with the case.

Contract Value

4909.45

Monetary Damages

4482.78

Legal Principles

The court applied the Rule of Law principle by determining that the district court lacked authority to disregard the plaintiff's affidavit of correctness under La. C.C.P. art. 1702(B)(3) and erred in not signing the proposed judgment. It also affirmed that interest rates must comply with La. R.S. 9:3519 and 9:3522, emphasizing adherence to statutory contractual rates.

Precedent Name

First Tower Loan v. Combs

Key Disputed Contract Clauses

The loan agreement specified a tiered interest rate structure: 30.48% for one year beginning December 13, 2023, and 18% thereafter, as mandated by La. R.S. 9:3519 and 9:3522. The court's reduction of this rate to 'legal interest' violated the contractual terms and statutory provisions governing interest rates on accelerated loans.

Cited Statute

  • Louisiana Civil Code
  • Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure
  • Louisiana Revised Statutes

Judge Name

  • STONE
  • Anastasia S. Wiley
  • ELLENDER
  • MARCOTTE

Passage Text

  • The district court lacked authority to disregard the affidavit of correctness and erred in not signing the proposed judgment.
  • The judgment will be amended to provide the contractual and legal rate.
  • For the reasons expressed in First Tower Loan v. Combs, 56,236 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/21/25), rendered this day, these assignments have merit.

Damages / Relief Type

  • Security interest in the movables described in the loan agreement affirmed.
  • Monetary Judgment: $4,482.78 with interest at 30.48% for one year and 18% thereafter, plus costs awarded to the plaintiff.