Republic vs Emmanuel John (Criminal Sessions Case No. 33 of 2022) [2024] TZHC 6251 (26 June 2024)

TanzLII

Automated Summary

Key Facts

Emmanuel John stands charged with murder under sections 196 and 197 of the Penal Code for allegedly beating two children (Nkamba Juma, 1.5 years old, and Giti Juma, 4 years old) with a stick in Masolo Village, Nkasi District, Rukwa Region on 15 September 2021. The prosecution and defense agreed the accused was insane at the time of the offense, as confirmed by a medical report (Exhibit P1) from Isanga Institution. The court found him not guilty by reason of insanity under section 13 of the Penal Code and ordered his detention at Isanga Mental Health Hospital as a mental disordered offender. The officer in charge of the institution is directed to report to the Minister of Legal Affairs after three years.

Issues

The court determined whether Emmanuel John was legally insane at the time of the murders of two children, as per section 13 of the Penal Code. The medical report (Exhibit P1) confirmed his insanity, and the court concluded he was not criminally responsible due to his mental disorder (Catatonic Schizophrenia), requiring him to be institutionalized at Isanga Mental Health Hospital.

Holdings

The court found that the accused, Emmanuel John, committed the act of murder but was legally insane at the time. As a result, he was not guilty of the offence under section 13 of the Penal Code. The court ordered him to be kept in Isanga Institution as a mental disordered offender, with a report to the Minister after three years.

Remedies

  • The Officer In charge of Isanga Institution is directed to make a report to the Minister responsible for legal affairs at the expiration of three years.
  • The accused is to be kept in Mental Health Hospital as a mental disordered offender.

Legal Principles

The court applied the legal principle of insanity as a defense under section 13 of the Penal Code, determining that the accused was not criminally responsible for the murders due to his mental state at the time of the offense. The judgment emphasizes that a person is not criminally responsible if, at the time of the act, they were incapable of understanding their actions, appreciating their wrongfulness, or controlling their behavior due to a mental disease. The court referenced sections 219 and 220 of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the medical examination and special findings for mentally disordered offenders.

Precedent Name

  • Agnes Doris Liundi v. The Republic
  • Majuto Samson v. The Republic
  • Francis Siza Rwambo vs The Republic

Cited Statute

  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Penal Code

Judge Name

A.A. Mrisha

Passage Text

  • Flowing from the above evidence, it is crystal clear that despite there been a proof that at the time of the commission of the offence of murder, the accused person was insane, yet he was suffering from a decease which affected his mind to the effect that he was incapable of understanding what he is doing, or appreciating that he ought not to do the acts which consequently led to the demise of the abovenamed deceased persons.
  • Having found so, I make a special finding to the effect that the abovenamed accused person did the act charged, but by reason of his insanity, is not guilty of the offence. He should, however, be kept in Mental Health Hospital which is Isanga Institution, as a mental disordered offender.
  • My careful examination of that document depicts that upon been medically examined by Dr. Enock Eteregho of Isanga Institution, the accused person was found to be insane at the time of the commission of the alleged offence.