Buseya Ibrahim Kamonja vs Wembo Shabani Marijani (Civil Application No. 4 of 2023) [2023] TZHC 20916 (1 September 2023)

TanzLII

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The applicant, Buseya Ibrahim Kamonja, sought an extension to file an appeal against a 2019 High Court land judgment. The respondent, Wembo Shabani Marijani, opposed the application, arguing it was time-barred and the applicant acted negligently. The court dismissed the application, citing insufficient evidence of illness during the critical delay period (May 2019–December 2019) and outpatient treatment records from 2020–2022 as inadequate justification. The ruling referenced Lyamuya Construction Company Ltd vs YWCA Tanzania (2010) as precedent for evaluating delay grounds.

Issues

The court evaluated whether Buseya Ibrahim Kamonja should be granted an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal against a 2019 judgment. The applicant cited illness following a COVID-19 diagnosis as the reason for delay, but the court noted medical records only covered 2020-2022, failing to account for the period from May 2019 to December 2019. Applying the criteria from Lyamuya Construction Company Ltd v Young Women's Christian Association of Tanzania (2010), the court found the delay inordinate, the applicant lacked diligence, and no sufficient grounds were shown. The application was dismissed for want of merit.

Holdings

The court dismissed the applicant's request for an extension of time to file an appeal, finding that he failed to account for the delay period as required by law. The applicant's medical records from 2020 to 2022 did not demonstrate a valid reason for the delay following the 2019 judgment, leading to the application being rejected for lack of merit.

Remedies

  • Application dismissed for want of merit. No order as to costs.
  • No order as to costs.

Legal Principles

The court applied the guidelines from Lyamuya Construction Co Ltd vs Young Women's Christian Association of Tanzania (Civil App No. 2 of 2010 CAT) for extension of time applications. These require: (1) the applicant must account for all the period of delay, (2) the delay should not be inordinate, and (3) the applicant must demonstrate diligence rather than negligence in pursuing the appeal. The ruling emphasized that the applicant failed to meet these criteria, particularly for the period between May 2019 and December 2019.

Precedent Name

Lyamuya Construction Company Ltd vs Board of Registered Trustees of Young Women's Christian Association of Tanzania

Cited Statute

Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap. 141 [R.E 2019]

Judge Name

Bahati Salema

Passage Text

  • The judgment of this Court was delivered on 08/05/2019 but all the medical exhibits attached to this application are from 2020 to 2022, none of the attached records shows that the applicant fell sick between May, 2019 to December, 2019.
  • Blending these facts to Lyamuya's Case (supra) the applicant has failed to account for the years of delay and for that reason the application is dismissed for want of merit. No order as to costs.