Elizabeth Leblanc Schroeder V Alan Conrad Schroeder

Court Listener

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal granted a supervisory writ application, vacating the family court's October 22, 2025 judgment regarding the valuation dates for community property interests in Orthopedic Surgery Center, LLC and The Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge, Inc. The court ruled that a declaratory judgment is an ordinary action, not a summary proceeding, and that a rule to show cause is an improper procedural vehicle for declaratory relief. It emphasized that declaratory judgments should resolve uncertainty, not merely try issues in a pending case, citing City of Baton Rouge v. State, ex rel. Dep't of Soc. Servs. and Girod Titling Tr. v. Hermes Health All.

Issues

  • The court concluded that declaratory judgment should not be used to merely try issues in a pending case. This aligns with precedent in Tyler v. Grantham, which emphasizes that declaratory relief is not appropriate for resolving matters already before the court.
  • The court determined that a rule to show cause is not the proper procedural vehicle for declaratory relief. The correct vehicle is an ordinary proceeding, as established in cases such as Girod Titling Tr. v. Hermes Health All. and Ehlenberger v. Guardian Med. Grp. LLC.

Holdings

  • A rule to show cause is not the proper procedural vehicle to request declaratory relief. The proper procedural vehicle is an ordinary proceeding. Girod Titling Tr. v. Hermes Health All., 2024-0201 (La. App. 4th Cir. 7/1/24), 401 So.3d 716, 720-21.
  • A partial judgment within this otherwise contested proceeding did not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding, and declaratory judgment should not be used to merely try issues in a pending case. See Ehlenberger v. Guardian Med. Grp. LLC, 2019-446 (La. App. 5th Cir. 5/29/20), 298 So.3d 375, 378, citing Tyler v. Grantham, 26,678 (La. App. 2d Cir. 7/21/94), 641 So.2d 632, 633.
  • The family court's October 22, 2025 judgment declaring the valuation dates for the community property interest in Orthopedic Surgery Center, LLC and The Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge, Inc. is vacated. A suit for a declaratory judgment is an ordinary action, not a summary proceeding. City of Baton Rouge v. State, ex rel. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 2007-0005 (La. App. 1st Cir. 9/14/07), 970 So.2d 985, 995, citing In re Melancon, 2005-1702 (La. 7/10/06), 935 So.2d 661, 665-66.

Remedies

Writ granted; the family court's October 22, 2025 judgment which declared the valuation dates for the community property interest in Orthopedic Surgery Center, LLC and The Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge, Inc. is vacated.

Legal Principles

  • A suit for a declaratory judgment is an ordinary action, not a summary proceeding. A rule to show cause is not the proper procedural vehicle for declaratory relief; the proper vehicle is an ordinary proceeding.
  • Declaratory judgment should not be used to merely try issues in a pending case. A partial judgment within an otherwise contested proceeding does not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding.

Precedent Name

  • Ehlenberger v. Guardian Med. Grp. LLC
  • Girod Titling Tr. v. Hermes Health All.
  • City of Baton Rouge v. State, ex rel. Dep't of Soc. Servs.
  • Tyler v. Grantham
  • In re Melancon

Judge Name

  • McCleland
  • Greene
  • Stromberg

Passage Text

  • A partial judgment within this otherwise contested proceeding did not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding, and declaratory judgment should not be used to merely try issues in a pending case.
  • WRIT GRANTED. The family court's October 22, 2025 judgment which declared the valuation dates for the community property interest in Orthopedic Surgery Center, LLC and The Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge, Inc. is vacated.
  • A suit for a declaratory judgment is an ordinary action, not a summary proceeding. City of Baton Rouge v. State, ex rel. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 2007-0005 (La. App. 1st Cir. 9/14/07), 970 So.2d 985, 995, citing In re Melancon, 2005-1702 (La. 7/10/06), 935 So.2d 661, 665-66.