Oliver's Italian Restaurant and Wine Bar Ltd v The Pensions Regulator -[2023] UKFTT 94 (GRC)- (01 February 2023)

BAILII

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber, dismissed the appeal by Oliver's Italian Restaurant and Wine Bar Limited against a Fixed Penalty Notice issued by The Pensions Regulator under section 40(1) of the Pensions Act 2008. The penalty of £400 was imposed for failing to comply with a Notice of Compliance dated 15 July 2022, which required the provision of information by 25 August 2022. The Tribunal found that the Employer had not provided evidence to rebut the statutory presumption of service (as notices were sent to the registered office address) and that no reasonable excuse for non-compliance was established. Consequently, the Tribunal confirmed the Fixed Penalty Notice and remitted the matter to the Regulator.

Issues

  • The tribunal found belated compliance did not constitute a reasonable excuse for non-compliance, and the Employer failed to provide evidence supporting such an excuse.
  • The tribunal determined the Notice of Compliance was properly served to the Employer via registered address, as no evidence rebutted the statutory presumption of service despite the Employer's non-receipt claim.

Holdings

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, remitted the matter to the Regulator, and confirmed the Fixed Penalty Notice of £400.

Remedies

The Tribunal confirmed the Fixed Penalty Notice issued by The Pensions Regulator, dismissing the employer's appeal and remitting the matter to the Regulator for implementation.

Monetary Damages

400.00

Legal Principles

  • The court determined the burden of proof rested with the employer to demonstrate non-receipt of the Notice of Compliance. The employer provided no evidence to support their claim, thus failing to meet the burden of proof required to rebut the statutory presumption of service.
  • The court applied the statutory presumption of service under section 303(6)(a) of the Pensions Act 2004 and regulation 15(4) of the Employers Duties Regulations 2010, which presumes documents sent to the registered office were received. The employer failed to provide evidence to rebut this presumption, leading to the conclusion that the Notice of Compliance was effectively served.

Cited Statute

  • Pensions Act 2004
  • Pensions Act 2008

Judge Name

Alison McKenna

Passage Text

  • 16. In all the circumstances, I determine that the Fixed Penalty Notice was the appropriate action for the Regulator to take in this case.
  • 1. The reference is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Regulator. The Fixed Penalty Notice is confirmed.