In re Estate of Karang’ae Kesier (Deceased) (Succession Cause 28 of 2017) [2023] KEHC 22341 (KLR) (21 September 2023) (Judgment)

Kenya Law

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The court allowed an application to rectify a grant in the Estate of Karang'ae Kesier, directing a fresh distribution of property (Narok/CIS-Mara Nairagie Enkare/77) to include Benson Shau Kesier. The original certificate of confirmation, issued in 2010, was to be amended per 2018 court orders. The court emphasized that rectification procedures address minor errors, while substantive changes require review jurisdiction, which was not followed here.

Deceased Name

Karang'ae Kesier

Issues

Whether rectification of a certificate of confirmation of grant is the appropriate procedure for substantive amendments to property distribution, or if review jurisdiction must be applied under the Law of Succession Act and Probate and Administration Rules. The court held that rectification is limited to correcting errors in descriptions or names, while substantive changes require review of prior orders followed by necessary amendments to the grant.

Holdings

  • The court determined that rectification of the grant was the appropriate procedure to address errors in the certificate of confirmation, as the prior orders by Hon. J.W. Bwonwong'a (04.07.2018) required substantive amendments to the property distribution. A fresh distribution of the affected property was ordered to ensure compliance with the court's earlier decision and prevent the estate from going to waste.
  • The court allowed the application for rectification of the grant dated 12.06.2023, ordering the issuance of a duly amended certificate of confirmation to align with prior court orders. The amendment addresses the distribution of property in Narok/CIS-Mara Nairagie Enkare/77, specifically allocating Four (4) acres to Benson Shau Kesier. No order as to costs was issued.

Remedies

  • The court ordered the amendment of the certificate of confirmation issued to Alex Karang'ae to include Benson Shau Kesier in the distribution of property Narok/CIS-Mara Nairagie Enkare/77, as per the orders of Hon. J.W. Bwonwong'a on 4th July 2018.
  • The court made no order as to costs in the case.

Probate Status

Amended certificate of confirmation issued to Alex Karangae, as per court orders.

Legal Principles

The court clarified that rectification of grants under the Law of Succession Act (section 74) and Probate and Administration Rules (Rule 43(1)) is limited to correcting errors in names, descriptions, or time/place of death. Substantive amendments to property distribution require a review of court orders, not mere rectification. This aligns with the principle that procedural mechanisms must match the nature of the issue (rectification for minor errors vs. review for material changes).

Succession Regime

Governing by Kenya's Law of Succession Act and Probate and Administration Rules, focusing on procedural amendments for estate distribution.

Precedent Name

Re Estate of Charles Kibe Karanja (Deceased)

Cited Statute

  • Law of Succession Act
  • Probate and Administration Rules

Judge Name

F. Gikonyo

Passage Text

  • 16. See Re Estate of Charles Kibe Karanja (Deceased) 2015 eKLR where the Court held as follows:
  • "If..... there is discovery of new assets that were not available or had not been discovered at the time of distribution, among others; it would be imprudent to seek rectification or alteration or amendment of the certificate of confirmation of grant. Such changes are fundamental, not superficial. They go to the core of the distribution. They cannot be affected without touching the orders made by the court at the distribution of the estate. Consequently, such changes cannot and should not be effected through a mere amendment of the certificate of confirmation of grant. The proper approach ought to be an application for review of the orders made at the confirmation of the grant." (own emphasis)
  • 18. Whereas the applicant has approached the court through the wrong procedure, following the amendment of the grant, it is only fair and just to review earlier distribution on, and order a fresh distribution in respect of the affected property.

Beneficiary Classes

Other