Automated Summary
Key Facts
Case No: 2306123/2020 involved Ms Sally Geldard (Claimant) and three respondents: Roost Restaurant Ltd, Roost Restaurant (Margate) Ltd, and Roost Restaurant (Trading) Limited. The Tribunal ruled that the claim against the first respondent was dismissed after the claimant withdrew it. Claims against the second and third respondents were also dismissed as the claimant was not employed by them. Judgment was delivered by Employment Judge Martin on 29 July 2021.
Issues
Whether the Claimant was employed by the second and third Respondents
Holdings
- The Claimant was not employed by the second or third Respondent and the claims against them are dismissed.
- On the Claimant withdrawing her claim against the first Respondent, the Claimant's claim is dismissed.
Remedies
- The claims against the second and third Respondents (Roost Restaurant (Margate) Ltd and Roost Restaurant (Trading) Limited) are dismissed because the Claimant was not employed by them.
- The Claimant's claim is dismissed after she withdrew it against the first Respondent, Roost Restaurant Ltd (1).
Legal Principles
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim against the first respondent after she withdrew it, and dismissed claims against the second and third respondents because the claimant was not employed by them. No specific legal principles were explicitly articulated in the judgment beyond these procedural and factual determinations.
Judge Name
Martin
Passage Text
- 1. On the Claimant withdrawing her claim against the first Respondent, the Claimant's claim is dismissed
- 2. The Claimant was not employed by the second or third Respondent and the claims against them are dismissed.