Kenneth Powell V Tensik Industries Llc And Efsa Holding Group Llc

Court Listener

Automated Summary

Key Facts

Plaintiff Kenneth Powell filed a Complaint against Defendants Tensik Industries LLC and EFSA Holding Group LLC in January 2025, alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, violation of Florida statutory law, and breach of duty of good faith. Powell paid $376,500 in installments for a mobile concrete batching plant that was never delivered as promised. Defendants failed to respond to the lawsuit or defend the action, leading to a default judgment. The Court accepted Powell's factual allegations as true, noting Defendants' willful delay and lack of response to multiple demands for resolution. Judgment was granted in the amount of $376,905, including the principal and filing fee, but excluding requested attorney's fees due to insufficient documentation.

Transaction Type

The dispute centers on a contract for the sale and delivery of a mobile concrete batching plant, where Plaintiff Kenneth Powell paid $395,000 to Defendants Tensik Industries, LLC and EFSA Holding Group, LLC for the plant, which was never delivered as agreed.

Issues

  • The Court evaluated whether default judgment is appropriate by considering three factors: (1) prejudice to the plaintiff if default is denied, (2) whether the defendant has a litigable defense, and (3) whether the defendant's delay is due to culpable conduct.
  • The Court determined the amount of damages by accepting the plaintiff's allegations regarding $376,500 in payments made for an undelivered mobile concrete batching plant and the $405 filing fee, but denied $2,593.62 in requested attorney's fees due to insufficient documentation.
  • The Court denied the plaintiff's request for $2,593.62 in attorney's fees because no legal basis or supporting documentation was provided under Florida or Pennsylvania law for the claims asserted.

Holdings

  • The Court denied Plaintiff's request for $2,593.62 in attorney's fees, noting that no legal basis or supporting documentation was provided for the claim under Florida and Pennsylvania law.
  • The Court granted Plaintiff Kenneth Powell's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Tensik Industries LLC and EFSA Holding Group LLC. The Court found that the three factors for default judgment weighed in favor of the plaintiff: (1) prejudice to the plaintiff if default is denied, (2) no litigable defense by the defendants, and (3) the defendants' delay was due to culpable conduct. The Court entered a default judgment in the amount of $376,905, which includes the $376,500 in payments and a $405 filing fee, but denied the $2,593.62 attorney's fees request due to lack of supporting documentation.

Remedies

  • The Court denies Plaintiff's request for $2,593.62 in attorney's fees, citing insufficient documentation and lack of legal basis under Florida and Pennsylvania law for such an award.
  • The Court grants Plaintiff Kenneth Powell's Motion for Default Judgment in the amount of $376,905, calculated from $376,500 in contract payments and a $405 filing fee. This award is based on the undisputed contractual obligations and failure of Defendants to deliver the mobile concrete batching plant.

Contract Value

395000.00

Monetary Damages

376905.00

Legal Principles

The court applied the three factors from Chamberlain v. Giampapa (210 F.3d 154, 164 (3d Cir. 2000)) to determine whether to grant a default judgment: (1) prejudice to the plaintiff if default is denied, (2) whether the defendant has a litigable defense, and (3) whether the defendant's delay is due to culpable conduct. The court also relied on the principle that factual allegations in the complaint (except damages) are taken as true upon entry of default, as established in DIRECTV, Inc. v. Pepe (431 F.3d 162).

Precedent Name

  • Chin v. Chrysler, LLC
  • DIRECTV, Inc. v. Pepe
  • Chamberlain v. Giampapa
  • Hritz v. Woma Corp.
  • United States v. $55,518.05 in U.S. Currency
  • Comdyne I, Inc. v. Corbin

Key Disputed Contract Clauses

  • The contract stipulated a 50% upfront payment ($197,500) and subsequent 20% ($79,000) and 50% ($50,000) payments, with the final payment contingent upon delivery and setup of the plant. Defendants accepted payments but failed to deliver the plant as required.
  • The contract required Defendants to deliver a new Pro Mobile 1-S Concrete Batching Plant to Plaintiff's Pennsylvania location by April 21, 2023 if payment was received by February 17, 2023. Defendants delayed delivery, citing a transport accident, but never completed delivery despite multiple demands.

Cited Statute

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Judge Name

Robert D. Mariani

Passage Text

  • Therefore, default judgment will be entered against Tensik Industries LLC and EFSA Holding Group LLC.
  • Accordingly, the Court will grant Plaintiff's motion for default judgment in the amount of $376,905 and deny Plaintiff's request for an additional $2,593.62 for attorney's fees.
  • The defaulting defendants... have affirmatively chosen not to defend this action. Defendants' lack of action... plainly amounts to deliberate and willful conduct.

Damages / Relief Type

Default Judgment in the amount of $376,905 (including $376,500 in contract payments and $405 filing fee).