HASMUKH KHETSHI SHAH v TINGA TRADERS LIMITED [2009] eKLR

Kenya Law

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The case (Civil Case 1218 of 2001) involves Hasmukh Khetshi Shah (Plaintiff) seeking to commit Tingga Traders Limited's chairman and agents, Charles Onchong'a Maina and Tom Mosoti Okonyo, to jail for six months and to have the Defendant's property attached and sold. The application was based on alleged contempt of a February 28, 2008 court order granting a temporary injunction to protect the Plaintiff's quiet enjoyment of premises at Thiga Building, Nairobi. The court dismissed the application, finding insufficient evidence of disobedience to the injunction, noting the absence of proof for the alleged insults, assault, and harassment, and acknowledging the risk of double jeopardy for the defendants.

Issues

The court considered whether the Defendant's agents, Charles Onchong'a Maina and Tom Mosoti Okonyo, violated the court's 28th February 2008 temporary injunction by harassing the Plaintiff and allegedly assaulting his brother, thereby warranting contempt charges and asset attachment.

Holdings

The court dismissed the application for contempt, finding that the Plaintiff failed to establish that the Defendant or its agents disobeyed the court order of 28th February 2008. The application was deemed without merit and was dismissed with costs.

Remedies

The court dismissed the application with costs, finding that the Plaintiff failed to establish that the Defendant or its agents disobeyed the court order of 28th February 2008. The application was determined to be without merit.

Legal Principles

  • The court considered the risk of double jeopardy in relation to the criminal charges against the defendants, noting that the mere fact of being charged does not prove the assault occurred or constituted contempt.
  • The court applied the standard of proof required to establish contempt of court, determining that the plaintiff failed to meet this standard. The application was dismissed as the necessary evidence of disobedience was not demonstrated.

Cited Statute

  • Judicature Act
  • English Supreme Court Rules
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Civil Procedure Act

Judge Name

H. P. G. Waweru

Passage Text

  • If indeed Charles Onchong'a Maina shouted 'unprintable insults' to the Plaintiff at the suit premises on 1st March, 2008, that would appear to have been conduct threatening a breach of the peace, and ought to have been reported to the police. It does not constitute disobedience of the order of the court of 28th February, 2008.
  • Having considered all matters placed before the court, I am not satisfied that it has been established to the required standard that the Defendant or its agents have been in disobedience of the order of the court of 28th February, 2008. The application is without merit. It is hereby dismissed with costs. It is so ordered.
  • (i) that Charles Onchong'a Maina shouted 'unprintable insults' at the Plaintiff on 1st March 2008 at the suit premises; (ii) that Charles Onchong'a Maina and Tom Mosoti Okonyo unlawfully attacked and assaulted the Plaintiff's brother, MAYUR SHAH, on 5th March, 2008 at the suit premises when they tried to unlawfully take the keys to the premises; and (iii) that the Defendant's agents have continued to disobey the court order by repeatedly abusing, embarrassing and/or disturbing the Plaintiff's peace, and have vowed to eject him from the suit premises any time irrespective of the existence of court orders.