Miss A J Plumbe v Baaj Capital LLP (England and Wales : Redundancy) -[2025] UKET 1805101/2023- (2 May 2025)

BAILII

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The claim was struck out due to the claimant's non-compliance with the Tribunal's Order dated 2023-11-14 and failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 2024-06-14.

Issues

  • The claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's Order dated 14th November 2023 and the claim was not actively pursued, leading to the claim being struck out.
  • The claimant did not make representations in writing or sufficient arguments against the strike out, nor requested a hearing, resulting in the claim being dismissed.

Holdings

  • The claim is struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's Order dated 14th November 2023 and did not actively pursue the claim. Additionally, the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing regarding the potential strike-out.
  • The claim is also struck out as the claimant did not make adequate written representations or any sufficient arguments to prevent the strike-out, nor did they request a hearing to address the issue.

Remedies

The claim is struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 14th November 2023 and did not actively pursue the claim. Additionally, the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing as required.

Legal Principles

The claim was struck out due to the claimant's non-compliance with the Tribunal's Order dated 14th November 2023 and failure to actively pursue the claim. Additionally, the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing as required by the Tribunal's letter dated 14th June 2024.

Judge Name

Employment Judge Harding

Passage Text

  • 1. By a letter dated 14th June 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because
  • 2. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.