Duman V Wigand

Court Listener

Automated Summary

Key Facts

Plaintiff James Bartolo Duman filed a complaint against Defendant Christopher Wigand, a circuit court judge in Broward County, Florida, challenging a child custody order entered by the state court. The Court dismissed the case for two reasons: (1) the Defendant has judicial immunity for judicial acts, and (2) the federal court cannot conduct appellate review of a state court judgment and therefore cannot grant the relief sought.

Issues

  • Whether the federal district court can conduct appellate review of a state court child custody order and grant relief on that matter, as federal courts lack authority to review state court judgments
  • Whether the defendant, Christopher Wigand, a circuit court judge in Broward County, Florida, has judicial immunity from the claims raised in the complaint for judicial acts, which would bar the federal court from granting relief

Holdings

The Court approved and adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The case is dismissed because the defendant, Christopher Wigand, has judicial immunity for judicial acts, and the Court cannot conduct appellate review of a state court judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and deny as moot any pending motions.

Remedies

The court approved the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, dismissed the Plaintiff's Complaint, ordered the Clerk of Court to close the case, and denied all pending motions as moot.

Legal Principles

The court applied judicial immunity doctrine, holding that a circuit court judge has immunity from civil liability for judicial acts. Additionally, the court applied 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) standards for in forma pauperis dismissal, concluding the complaint fails to state a claim because the federal court cannot conduct appellate review of a state court judgment or grant relief that the court lacks jurisdiction to provide.

Precedent Name

  • Bolin v. Story
  • Phillips v. Mashburn
  • Bilal v. Driver
  • Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp.
  • Gates v. Miami Police Dep't
  • Neitzke v. Williams
  • Cofield v. Ala. Public Serv. Comm'n
  • Sun v. Forrester

Cited Statute

  • Title 28 of the United States Code Section 1915(e)(2)
  • Title 28 of the United States Code Section 1915

Judge Name

Judge Raag Singhal

Passage Text

  • First, the Defendant has judicial immunity for judicial acts. Bolin v. Story, 225 F.3d 1234, 1239 (11th Cir. 2000).
  • Plaintiff sues Defendant, Christopher Wigand, who is a circuit court judge in Broward County, Florida. Plaintiff's Complaint raises issue with a child custody order entered by the state court.
  • Second, this Court cannot conduct an appellate review of a state court judgment and, therefore, the Court cannot grant Plaintiff the request he seeks.