MINISTRY OF HEALTH v VOLAILLES ET TRADITIONS LTEEMr Navish Jheelan, Senior District Magistrate

Supreme Court of Mauritius

Automated Summary

Key Facts

Volailles et Traditions Ltee was convicted by the District Court of Moka for selling chicken contaminated with salmonella bacteria, violating regulation 62(1) of the Food Regulations 1999. The Central Health Laboratory confirmed salmonella presence in two chicken samples from the accused's Melrose premises (tested 18 June 2019), and the court found prosecution evidence unshaken beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting the defense's SGS Laboratory counter-analysis which tested only a portion of the product.

Issues

The legal issue centered on whether the accused breached Food Regulations 1999 by selling chicken containing salmonella bacteria, with the prosecution's evidence from the Central Health Laboratory accepted over the defense's SGS Laboratory counter-analysis.

Holdings

The court found Volailles et Traditions Ltee guilty of selling chicken containing salmonella bacteria in breach of regulation 62(1) of the Food Regulations 1999, based on Central Health Laboratory findings.

Legal Principles

The court applied the criminal standard of proof, requiring the prosecution to establish the breach of Food Regulations 1999 beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence including laboratory analysis, chain of custody documentation, and unshaken testimony was deemed sufficient to meet this standard.

Cited Statute

Food Regulations 1999

Judge Name

Navish Jheelan

Passage Text

  • First, Inspector Daumoo has asserted that the chicken was placed in a sealed sterile container containing ice packs in the presence of the Quality Control Manager of the accused before being sent to the Central Health Laboratory.
  • Seventh, the Operations Manager of SGS Laboratory has claimed that the report of the Central Health Laboratory makes no mention of the method which was used to examine the chicken, but the procedure which was followed has been satisfactorily explained by the Medical Laboratory Technologist during the proceedings in Court.
  • I accordingly find the accused guilty as charged.