Thulare v Thulare and Others In Re: Thulare and Another v Thulare and Others (8767/2021) [2022] ZALMPPHC 53 (19 October 2022)

Saflii

Automated Summary

Key Facts

The court ruled on a dispute over the rightful appointment of an Acting King for the Bapedi nation following the death of King Victor Thulare III in 2021. Key facts include: (1) The late King died without a candle wife or heir, creating a leadership vacuum. (2) A valid royal family meeting on 28 February 2021, attended by 46 members, appointed Morwamohube (eldest surviving son of the late King’s father) as Acting King and seed raiser under customary law. (3) A prior meeting on 21 February 2021 led by Manyaku (mother of the late King) was invalidated due to improper composition and non-compliance with the Limpopo Act. (4) Evidence confirmed Morwamohube’s legitimacy as the late King’s half-brother and the customary practice of appointing the eldest surviving male relative in such cases. (5) Manyaku’s claims to act as Queen or Regent were rejected as they contradicted Bapedi traditions and statutory requirements.

Issues

  • The court was asked to confirm Morwamohube's biological relationship to King Rhyne Sekhukhune III, which is crucial for his eligibility as an Acting King. This involved examining genealogical evidence and affidavits.
  • The court needed to determine if the group of persons who gathered at the meetings held on 21 February 2021 and 9 March 2021 constituted the true Royal Family of the late King Thulare Victor Thulare III. The main issue was the validity of Manyaku's meeting attendance versus the 28 February meeting.
  • The court had to evaluate the validity of Makgalake's marriage to King Rhyne Sekhukhune III in terms of customary law. This was essential to establish Morwamohube's lineage and his right to the royal family's role in succession.
  • The court was required to assess if Manyaku, who was appointed as Queen or Regent in the 21 February 2021 meeting, met the criteria to be an Acting King or Queen according to Bapedi customary law. The dispute centered on her eligibility given the transition of the Kingship to her son.
  • The court had to decide if the meeting held on 28 February 2021, attended by 46 people, was the legitimate gathering of the Royal Family as defined by the Limpopo Act and customary law. This was in contrast to Manyaku's smaller meeting on 21 February.
  • The court needed to determine if Morwamohube, appointed as Acting King and seed raiser in the 28 February 2021 meeting, met the customary law requirements for such roles. This included verifying his lineage and the legitimacy of the royal family meeting's decision.
  • The court needed to decide if the interim interdict order in favor of Manyaku under case number 5197/2021 should be confirmed as a final order. This was part of her counter application against Morwamohube's claim to the Acting Kingship.

Holdings

  • The court rejected the contention that the royal family of the Bapedi nation consists of only five people (Manyaku, her two sons, her daughter, one uncle, and two common wives of the late King Victor Thulare III), affirming that the royal family includes immediate and close relatives of the ruling family as defined by customary law.
  • The court found that the 21 February 2021 meeting, attended by Manyaku and five others, did not comply with the statutory requirements for a royal family meeting under the Limpopo Act. It was held in contravention of the prior agreement to postpone to 28 February 2021.
  • The court concluded that Manyaku's claim to act as Queen Regent or Acting Queen was invalid because the Kingship had already moved to her son, the late King Victor Thulare III. Even if the 21 February 2021 meeting had appointed her, it lacked legal validity.
  • The court declared that the meeting held by the Thulare Royal Family on 28 February 2021 was a properly constituted meeting of the royal family, and the decision to appoint Morwamohube as the Acting King of the Bapedi nation and seed raiser in the house of the late King Victor Thulare III was a lawful decision.

Remedies

  • The court granted Morwamohube's main application by declaring that the meeting held by the Thulare Royal Family on 28 February 2021 was a properly constituted royal family meeting and that the decision to appoint Morwamohube as the Acting King of the Bapedi nation and seed raiser in the late King Victor Thulare III's house was a lawful decision.
  • The interim interdict order dated 5 August 2021 in favour of Manyaku under case number 5197/2021 is discharged and the application brought by Manyaku under case number 4253/2021 is dismissed with costs.
  • Manyaku shall be liable to pay the costs of the application, such costs to include the costs of two Counsel.
  • The Counter application brought by Manyaku is dismissed with costs of two Counsel.

Legal Principles

  • The court interpreted the National and Limpopo Acts using a purposive approach to ensure traditional leadership succession followed customary law and legislative intent. It rejected Manyaku's claims as inconsistent with the purpose of upholding legitimate royal family structures and customary practices.
  • Manyaku failed to meet her burden of proof to demonstrate the legitimacy of her group as the royal family or that the 28 February 2021 meeting was invalid. The court found her evidence insufficient to support her claims of proper royal family composition and appointment as Queen Regent.
  • The court emphasized adherence to the constitutional recognition of traditional leadership and the Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Act (2019) and Limpopo TraditionalLeadership and Institutions Act (2005). It held that royal family meetings must comply with statutory requirements, including functioning according to customary law and maintaining proper minutes as mandated by Section 17 of the Limpopo Act.
  • The court invalidated the 21 February 2021 meeting due to its exclusion of key royal family members, prioritizing substance (legitimate composition) over form (procedural compliance). It confirmed the 28 February 2021 meeting as valid despite procedural claims, as it genuinely represented the royal family as per statutory definitions.

Precedent Name

  • Maxwele Royal Family v Premier of the Eastern Cape Province
  • Kgoshikgolo Kgagudi Kenneth Sekhukhune and Another v The Commission on Traditional Leadership Disputes and Claims and Others
  • Mphephu v Mphephu – Ramabulana and Others

Cited Statute

  • Limpopo Traditional Leadership and Institutions Act 6 of 2005
  • Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act 41 of 2003
  • Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Act 3 of 2019
  • Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Judge Name

Em Makgoba

Passage Text

  • The meeting of 28 February 2021 is the rightful meeting of the royal family of the late King Victor Thulare III... The other meeting organized by Manyaku and five (5) other people on 21 February 2021 is not the rightful meeting of the royal family.
  • What Manyaku is suggesting about the succession to the Kingship of Bapedi nation is not only untenable but a taboo... such a practice will also never be accommodated in the culture of White People.
  • The decision taken in the meeting of 21 February 2021 does not comply with the requirements and provisions of section 17 of the Limpopo Act... the composition of the said meeting of 21 February 2021 attended by Manyaku and her children together with Ramphelane alone does not constitute the royal family meeting of the Bapedi nation.