Kalangala-Infrastructure-Services-Limited-V-Uganda-Revenue-Authority-Tat-265-Of-2022-12Th-March-2025

JibuDocs File Manager

Automated Summary

Key Facts

Kalangala Infrastructure Services Limited (applicant) obtained USD 12 million in loans (USD 5M from Nedbank Limited and USD 7M from Emerging Africa Infrastructure Fund (EAIF, Mauritius-based)) to fund infrastructure projects on Bugala Island, Uganda. The Uganda Revenue Authority (respondent) assessed withholding tax of Shs. 1,872,938,802 on interest paid to EAIF, but the applicant objected, claiming exemption under Section 82(5) of the Income Tax Act (ITA). The Tribunal ruled that EAIF qualifies as a financial institution of public character, meeting ITA exemption criteria, and ordered the respondent to refund 30% of the disputed tax (Shs. 440,723,213) with interest.

Tax Type

Withholding Tax on Interest Payments

Issues

The main issue for determination by the Tribunal is whether interest payments made by the Applicant to EAIF are exempt from withholding tax.

Tax Years

  • 2016
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2015

Holdings

  • EAIF qualifies as a financial institution of public character under Section 82(5) of the ITA, making interest payments exempt from withholding tax.
  • The Uganda-Mauritius Double Tax Agreement (DTA) does not apply as EAIF is already exempt under domestic law.
  • The application is allowed; the applicant is not liable for the assessed tax, and a refund is ordered.

Remedies

  • Costs are awarded to the Applicant.
  • The applicant is not liable to pay the assessed tax.
  • The Respondent should refund the 30% of the tax in dispute.

Tax Issue Category

Withholding-Tax Characterisation

Legal Principles

The Tribunal applied the principle of substance over form in determining that Emerging Africa Infrastructure Fund (EAIF) qualifies as a financial institution of public character under Section 82(5) of the Income Tax Act, despite its specialized focus on infrastructure projects. The analysis emphasized EAIF's actual operations and public benefit rather than technical limitations on accessibility.

Disputed Tax Amount

1284961527.00

Precedent Name

AFGRI Uganda Limited V URA

Cited Statute

Income Tax Act

Judge Name

  • MR. SIRAJ ALI
  • MRS. CHRISTINE KATWE
  • MS. CRYSTAL KABAJWARA

Passage Text

  • In the present case however, EAIF lends to any member of the public who intends to utilize the funds towards developing infrastructure projects in Africa.
  • we are satisfied that EAIF met all the conditions stipulated in Section 82(5) of the ITA. Therefore, it was not liable to withholding tax on the interest income earned from funding extended to the Applicant.
  • Section 82 (5) is one of such provisions. It is aimed at facilitating the raising of capital outside Uganda from foreign lenders. By exempting interest income paid to qualifying financial institutions who meet the criteria in the provision, the government aims to incentivize such foreign lenders to lend to Ugandan projects.